Issue Archives

Wolff v. McDonnell is the seminal case outlining the due process rights due to incarcerated people in disciplinary hearings. The Court held that incarcerated people are entitled to the minimum procedures appropriate under the circumstances and required by the Due Process Clause but stopped short of adopting the full panoply of procedural safeguards. Namely, the Court found that incarcerated people have no due process right to confront...

This Essay is the first scholarly intervention, from any discipline, to examine the number and nature of asylum claims made by U.S. citizens, and to explore the broader implications of this phenomenon. While the United States continues to be a preeminent destination for persons seeking humanitarian protection, U.S. citizens have fled the country in significant numbers, filing approximately 14,000 asylum claims since 2000. By formally seeking refuge...

THE NEW ABORTION BATTLEGROUND

David S. Cohen,* Greer Donley** & Rachel Rebouchรฉ***

This Article examines the paradigm shift that is occurring now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade. Returning abortion law to the states will spawn perplexing legal conflicts across state borders and between states and the federal government. This Article emphasizes how these issues intersect with innovations in the delivery of abortion, which can now occur entirely online and transcend state boundaries. The interjurisdictional...

The electric grid is the bedrock of modern society, but recent climate events have highlighted that it may be vulnerable to extreme weather. One possible explanation for the gridโ€™s climate sensitivity is that its vast, interconnected hardware is exposed to the elements and has been built to withstand historical environmental conditions. Due to climate change, however, historical data regarding temperature, precipitation, and extreme weather is...

RELYING ON RESTATEMENTS

Shyamkrishna Balganesh*

Restatements of the Law occupy a unique place in the American legal system. For nearly a century, they have played a prominent and influential role as legal texts that courts routinely rely on in a wide variยญety of fields. Despite their ubiquitous and pervasive use by courts, Restatements are not formal sources of law. While they resemble statutes in their form and structure, Restatements are produced entirely by a priยญvate organization of experts...

DELEGATION AT THE FOUNDING: A RESPONSE TO THE CRITICS

Julian Davis Mortenson & Nicholas Bagley*

This Essay responds to the wide range of commentary on Delegation at the Founding, published previously in the Columbia Law Review. The criticsโ€™ arguments deserve thoughtful consideration and a careful response. Weโ€™re happy to supply both. As a matter of eighteenth-century legal and political theory, โ€œrulemakingโ€ could not be neatly described as either legislative or executive based on analysis of its scope, subject, or substantive...

International human rights law is often associated with the progressive expansion of justice and freedom. But that link cannot be taken for granted. The Peopleโ€™s Republic of China (PRC) is attempting to transform human rights into an instrument of twenty-first century global authoritarianism. This Note seeks to fill a significant lacuna in the literature by focusing on Chinaโ€™s efforts at the regional, national, and subnational levels to socialize...

THE MYTH OF THE LABORATORIES OF DEMOCRACY

Charles W. Tyler* & Heather K. Gerken**

A classic constitutional parable teaches that our federal system of government allows states to function as โ€œlaboratories of democracy.โ€ This tale has been passed down from generation to generation, often to justify constitutional protections for state autonomy from the federal government. But scholars have failed to explain how state governments manage to overcome numerous impediments to experimentation, including resource scarcity, free rider...

UNMASKING TEXTUALISM: LINGUISTIC MISUNDERSTANDING IN THE TRANSIT MASK ORDER CASE AND BEYOND

Stefan Th. Gries, Michael Kranzlein, Nathan Schneider, Brian Slocum & Kevin Tobia*

COVID-19 has killed over one million Americans, and its massive impact on society is still unfolding. The governmentโ€™s strategy to combat the disease included an order regulating the wearing of masks on transit. Recently, a federal district court vacated the governmentโ€™s transit mask order, ruling that the order exceeds the statutory authority of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The district court relied heavily on the statuteโ€™s...

As the flaws, injustices, and harmful effects of cash bail systems have come under the spotlight, some plaintiffs have successfully brought ยง 1983 claims against municipalities in federal court challenging the constitutionality of judicially promulgated bail schedules. Adherence to these bail schedules deprives detainees of individualized bail-setting hearings and results in the detention of those who are unable to pay the prescheduled bail amount....