Issue Archives

In Honor of Peter L. Strauss

Editors of the Columbia Law Review

Peterย L. Strauss,ย Betts Professor of Law Versions of the following Essays were presented at a Symposium in Honor of Peter L.ย Straussย on April 24, 2015. Professorย Straussย is the Betts Professor of Law at Columbia Law School, where he has been a member of the faculty since 1971. In addition to his duties on the faculty, Professorย Straussย has contributed greatly […]

Political polarization has become a major focus in contemporary discussions on congressional activity and governance. The tone of these discussions has grown increasingly grim, as many political scientists argue that a constitutional system of divided and shared powers hardens current levels of partisan warfare into legislative gridlock. Proposals for reform abound. Scholars and political commentators have called for modifications to the electoral...

Administrative agencies are strikingly absent from leading accounts of contemporary polarization. To the extent they appear, it is largely as acted-upon entities that bear the fallout from the congressionalโ€“presidential confrontations that polarยญization fuels, or as the tools of presidential unilateralism. This failure to incorporate administrative agencies into polarization accounts is a major omission. Agencies possess broad grants of preexisting...

Unorthodox Lawmaking, Unorthodox Rulemaking

Abbe R. Gluck,* Anne Joseph Oโ€™Connell,** and Rosa Po***

The Schoolhouse Rock! cartoon version of the conventional legislative process is dead, if it was ever an accurate description in the first place. Major policy today is often the product of โ€œunorthodox lawmakingโ€ and โ€œunorthodox rulemakingโ€โ€”deviations from tradiยญtional process marked by frequent use of omnibus bills and multiple agency implementation; emergency statutes and regulations issued without prior comment; outsourcing...

The Supreme Courtโ€™s decision in Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. continues to obsess academics and courts alike. Despite all the attention, however, the โ€œChevron revolutionโ€ never quite happens. This decision, though seen as transยญformatively important, is honored in the breach, in constant danger of being abandoned, and the subject of perpetual confusion and uncertainty. This Essay seeks both...

In recent years, most would associate โ€œintent skepticismโ€ with the rise of modern textualism. In fact, however, many diverse approachesโ€”legal realism, modern pragmatism, Dworkinian constructivism, and even Legal Process purposivismโ€”all build on the common theme that a complex, multimember body such as Congress lacks any subjective intention about the kind of dif

Introduction At the end of June 2014, the Supreme Court decided one of the most publicized controversies of decades. In a decision covering two cases, widely referred to as Hobby Lobby, the Court held that closely held for-profit corporations, based on their ownersโ€™ religious convictions, have a right under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) […]

Section 440.10(1)(i) of the New York Criminal Procedure Law allows victims of sex trafficking to vacate convictions for certain offenses they were forced to commit by their traffickers. This vacatur provision and similar laws in other states have been praised for their ability to give victims of sex trafficking a fresh start, free from the stigma of a criminal record....

Free Exercise Lochnerism

Elizabeth Sepper*

In this Article, I identify and critique a phenomenon I call Free Exercise Lochnerism. In promoting corporate religious exemptions from employment and consumer protections, litigants, scholars, and courts are resurrecting Lochner v. New Yorkโ€”a case symbolic of the courtsโ€™ widely criticized use of freedom of contract to strike down economic regulation at the turn of the last century. Today, in their interpretations of the First Amendment...

Identity as Proxy

Lauren Sudeall Lucas*

As presently constructed, equal protection doctrine is an identity-based jurisprudence, meaning that the level of scrutiny applied to an alleged act of discrimination turns on the identity category at issue. In that sense, equal protection relies on identity as a proxy, standing in to signify the types of discrimination we find most troubling.

Equal protectionโ€™s current use of identity as proxy leads to a number of problems, including...