CLR Forum

  • Vol. 109

ON MACAWS AND EMPLOYER LIABILITY: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR ZATZ

Tristin K. Green*
  • Vol. 109

MELENDEZ-DIAZ V. MASSACHUSETTS, RODRIGUEZ V. CITY OF HOUSTON, AND REMEDIAL RATIONING

Jennifer E. Laurin*
  • Vol. 109

A CLOSER LOOK AT THE FEDERALIZATION SNOWBALL

Abigail R. Moncrieff*
  • Vol. 109

SHOULD JURIES BE THE GUIDE FOR ADVENTURES THROUGH APPRENDI-LAND?

Douglas A. Berman*
  • Vol. 109

METHODOLOGICAL ADVANCES AND EMPIRICAL LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP: A NOTE ON COX AND MILES’S VOTING RIGHTS ACT STUDY

Nancy C. Staudt*; Tyler J. VanderWeele**
  • Vol. 109

HISTORICAL PRACTICE AND THE CONTEMPORARY DEBATE OVER CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW

Ernest A. Young*
  • Vol. 109

RETRIBUTIVISTS NEED NOT AND SHOULD NOT ENDORSE THE SUBJECTIVIST ACCOUNT OF PUNISHMENT

Kenneth W. Simons*

ACCOUNTING FOR HAPPINESS IN CIVIL SETTLEMENTS

Rick Swedloff*

DOCUMENTING DISCRIMINATION?

Adam B. Cox*; Thomas J. Miles**

WHY COUNTING VOTES DOESN’T ADD UP: A RESPONSE TO COX AND MILES’ JUDGING THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT

Ellen D. Katz*; Anna Baldwin**