The Supreme Court has made clear that a district court may grant class action certification only after conducting a rigorous analysis to ensure that the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been met. Less clear, however, is what exactly a rigorous analysis entails. As precertification scrutiny has become more robust, reliance on expert testimony has become nearly indispensable for obtaining class certification....
Evidence Law
In the 2017 case Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado, the Supreme Court held that the jury no-impeachment rule must yield to a criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury when a court is faced with clear evidence that racial animus played a significant role in the jury’s decision to convict. Despite the Supreme Court notably cabining its decision to instances of racial bias alone, commentators have questioned whether...
There is a war raging over the admissibility of the prior bad acts of criminal defendants in federal trials. While many circuits treat Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) as a rule of “inclusion” and liberally admit such prior bad-acts evidence with predictably explosive effects on criminal juries, a few circuits are developing rigorous standards designed to foreclose prosecutorial use of such bad-acts evidence. This Article chronicles the...