Vol. 112 THE PURPOSE-DRIVEN RULE: DREW PETERSON, GILES V. CALIFORNIA, AND THE TRANSFERRED INTENT DOCTRINE OF FORFEITURE BY WRINGDOING Colin Miller*
Vol. 112 NULLIFYING THE DEBT CEILING THREAT ONCE AND FOR ALL: WHY THE PRESIDENT SHOULD EMBRACE THE LEAST UNCONSTITUTIONAL OPTION Neil H. Buchanan* & Michael C. Dorf**
Vol. 112 LABOR SPEECH, CORPORATE SPEECH, AND POLITICAL SPEECH: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR SACHS Matthew T. Bodie∗
Vol. 112 HOUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM: DOES THE SECOND AMENDMENT CREATE A PROPERTY RIGHT TO A SPECIFIC FIREARM? John L. Schwab∗ & Thomas G. Sprankling∗∗
Vol. 112 THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF “HOT NEWS” MISAPPROPRIATION AFTER BARCLAYS CAPITAL V. THEFLYONTHEWALL.COM Shyamkrishna Balganesh*
Vol. 112 MESSERSCHMIDT AND CONVERGENCE IN ACTION: A REPLY TO COMMENTS ON TRAWLING FOR HERRING Jennifer E. Laurin *