Vol. 109 METHODOLOGICAL ADVANCES AND EMPIRICAL LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP: A NOTE ON COX AND MILES’S VOTING RIGHTS ACT STUDY Nancy C. Staudt*; Tyler J. VanderWeele**
Vol. 109 HISTORICAL PRACTICE AND THE CONTEMPORARY DEBATE OVER CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW Ernest A. Young*
Vol. 109 DESCRIBING THE EFFECT OF ADAPTATION ON SETTLEMENT John Bronsteen*; Christopher Buccafusco**; Jonathan Masur***
Vol. 109 EVALUATING THE CONSEQUENCES OF CALIBRATED SENTENCING: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR KOLBER Miriam H. Baer*
Vol. 109 RETRIBUTIVISTS NEED NOT AND SHOULD NOT ENDORSE THE SUBJECTIVIST ACCOUNT OF PUNISHMENT Kenneth W. Simons*
WHY COUNTING VOTES DOESN’T ADD UP: A RESPONSE TO COX AND MILES’ JUDGING THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT Ellen D. Katz*; Anna Baldwin**