Issue Archives

Recent years have seen the dramatic growth of Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL), a class of unregulated fintech products that permit consumers to finance purchases by dividing payments into several interest-free installments. BNPL presents novel regulatory challenges because it is primarily marketed to consumers as an interest-free alternative to credit, and its distinctive market structure is characterized by lenderโ€“merchant agreements that promote...

Against rising calls to expand carceral psychiatry and increasingly pervasive mischaracterizations of neurodivergence in law, this Note accurately introduces the neurodiversity paradigm to call for the abolition of psychiatric incarceration. This Note challenges empirical narratives that render Neurodivergent people incapable of producing knowledge and holding expertise on their own embodied experiences by rejecting dominant conceptions of โ€œmental...

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND DEMOCRATIC PROPORTIONALITY

Jessica Bulman-Pozen* & Miriam Seifter**

State constitutional law is in the spotlight. As federal courts retrench on abortion, democracy, and more, state constitutions are defining rights across the nation. Despite intermittent calls for greater attention to state constitutional theory, neither scholars nor courts have provided a comprehensive account of state constitutional rights or a coherent framework for their adjudication. Instead, many state courts import federal interpretive practices...

Recent technological developments related to the extraction and processing of data have given rise to concerns about a reduction of privacy in the workplace. For many low-income and subordinated racial minority workforces in the United States, however, on-the-job data collection and algorithmic decisionmaking systems are having a more profound yet overlooked impact: These technologies are fundamentally altering the experience of labor and undermining...

THE FALSE PROMISE OF JURISDICTION STRIPPING

Daniel Epps* & Alan M. Trammell**

Jurisdiction stripping is seen as a nuclear option. Its logic is simple: By depriving federal courts of jurisdiction over some set of cases, Congress ensures those courts cannot render bad decisions. To its proponents, it offers the ultimate check on unelected and unaccountable judges. To its critics, it poses a grave threat to the separation of powers. Both sides agree, though, that jurisdiction stripping is a powerful weapon. On this understanding,...

This Piece describes a sophisticated but underreported system of mass-defendant intellectual property litigation called the โ€œSchedule A Defendants Schemeโ€ (the โ€œSAD Schemeโ€), which occurs most frequently in the Northern District of Illinois and principally targets online merchants based in China. The SAD Scheme capitalizes on weak spots in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, judicial deference to IP rightsowners, and online marketplacesโ€™...

Gig workers constitute an ever-increasing share of the American workforce, yet they are not afforded the rights to strike and bargain collectively under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) due to their independent contractor status. Independent contractors who attempt to act collectively face antitrust liability, whereas employees who are covered by the NLRA enjoy an antitrust exemption for the same collective action, known as the โ€œlabor...

In June 2022 the Supreme Court decided two unrelated cases, Dobbs v. Jackson Womenโ€™s Health Organization and Ruan v. United States, each with significant implications for the criminal regulation of doctors. Dobbs removed abortionโ€™s constitutional protection; in its wake, many states passed criminal statutes banning the procedure except in medical emergencies. The vagueness of those emergency exceptions, however, has...

Drawing from the experience of coauthoring scholarship with two activists who were sentenced to life without parole over three decades ago, this piece outlines the theory and practice of Participatory Law Scholarship (PLS). PLS is legal scholarship written in collaboration with authors who have no formal training in the law but rather expertise in its function and dysfunction through lived experience. By foregrounding lived experience in lawโ€™s...

TEXTUALISMโ€™S DEFINING MOMENT

William N. Eskridge, Jr.,* Brian G. Slocum** & Kevin Tobia***

Textualism promises simplicity and objectivity: Focus on the text, the whole text, and nothing but the text. But the newest version of textualism is not so simple. Now that textualism is the Supreme Courtโ€™s dominant interpretive theory, most interpretive disputes implicate textualism, and its inherent complexities have surfaced. This Article is the first to document the major categories of doctrinal and theoretical choices that regularly divide...