AN UPDATED PRO CODES ACT: ENHANCING PUBLIC ACCESS TO PRIVATELY COPYRIGHTED LAWS

AN UPDATED PRO CODES ACT: ENHANCING PUBLIC ACCESS TO PRIVATELY COPYRIGHTED LAWS

Often, private organizations composed of subject matter experts draft technical standards that describe safety recommendations or “best practices” for certain industries. Legislators and regulators on the federal, state, and local levels will, on occasion, provide legal weight to these privately created standards by incorporating them by reference into the law. Following these standards thus becomes mandatory, but the American people frequently do not have free and unrestricted access to them: The standards’ private copyright holders often charge users high fees to even read them. To address this issue, Congress is currently considering the Pro Codes Act, legislation intended to balance the importance of having these private organizations develop industry standards while also ensuring that citizens have sufficient access to the laws that govern them. The present draft of the legislation, however, falls short of truly providing Americans with access to these critical technical standards. This Note proposes various provisions that would strengthen the Pro Codes Act and more appropriately balance the interests of both standards development organizations and the American public.

The full text of this Note can be found by clicking the PDF link to the left.

“[T]he Roman despot Caligula . . . had laws written in fine print and hung them high up on pillars so that they were not available to nor readable by the Roman citizens affected by such laws.”
— United States v. Kilkenny. 1 493 F.3d 122, 126 (2d Cir. 2007) (citing 1 William Blackstone, Commentaries *46).

Introduction

In 2022, an estimated 6,200 children in the United States were treated in emergency rooms as a result of fallen or tipped-over home furniture. 2 Adam Suchy, U.S. Consumer Prod. Safety Comm’n., Product Instability or Tip-Over Injuries and Fatalities Associated With Televisions, Furniture, and Appliances: 2023 Report 12 tbl. 2 (2024), https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/2023_Annual_Tip_Over_Report_Posted_2024Feb_FINAL_0.pdf [https://perma.cc/BRE5-EKWG]. Seeking to prevent these dangerous situations, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) promulgated a new regulation that “prescribes safety requirements for clothing storage units . . . to protect children up to 72 months of age from tip-over-related death or injury.” 3 16 C.F.R. § 1261.1 (2025). This regulation specifies that all clothing storage units that meet certain criteria “shall comply” with “ASTM F2057-23, Standard Safety Specification for Clothing Storage Units.” 4 Id. § 1261.2. But the mandatory, legally binding requirements detailed in ASTM F2057-23 that are designed to reduce child injuries are not available in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 5 See id. or the Federal Register. 6 See Safety Standard for Clothing Storage Units, 88 Fed. Reg. 28,403 (May 4, 2023) (codified at 16 C.F.R. § 1261). Instead, the CPSC regulation merely incorporates by reference ASTM F2057-23, 7 16 C.F.R. § 1261.2. which is a privately created and copyrighted set of standards drafted by ASTM International, a nongovernment organization that develops safety and regulatory standards. 8 See ASTM Int’l, Helping Our World Work Better 4 (2023), https://www.astm.org/media/wysiwyg/Helping-Our-World-English.pdf [https://perma.cc/X94C-CZ4M] (“More than 30,000 people from 155+ countries create and update standards through ASTM International, one of the world’s most respected standards development organizations.”). As such, the CPSC directs individuals and organizations interested in reading the complete ASTM F2057-23 standard to either (1) purchase the publication directly from ASTM International 9 See 16 C.F.R. § 1261.2 (stating that the public “may also obtain a copy [of ASTM F2057-23] from ASTM International”). —which costs ninety-nine dollars 10 ASTM Int’l, ASTM F2057-23: Standard Safety Specification for Clothing Storage Units (2023). Members of the public can purchase either a print copy or a PDF copy of ASTM F2057-23 for ninety-nine dollars from ASTM’s website. ASTM F2057-23: Standard Safety Specification for Clothing Storage Units, ASTM Int’l, https://www.astm.org/f2057-23.html [https://perma.cc/CR5B-24UA] (last visited Aug. 6, 2025). A read-only online version of the document that cannot be downloaded or printed is currently viewable in ASTM International’s digital reading room. Reading Room, ASTM Int’l, https://www.astm.org/products-services/reading-room.html [https://perma.cc/YG54-HV8Z] (last visited Aug. 6, 2025). ASTM provides this read-only access voluntarily, and no law prevents the revocation of this access. See Off. of the Fed. Reg., Incorporation by Reference in the CFR, Nat’l Archives, https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html [https://
perma.cc/8V8Q-JEFU] (last visited Sep. 7, 2025) (“There is no legal requirement that the general public be able to freely access IBR material online.”).
—or (2) travel to view a free library copy at a federal office building near Washington, D.C. 11 See 16 C.F.R. § 1261.2 (“[ASTM F2057-23] is available for inspection at the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).”).  The relative inaccessibility of this binding law creates a substantive barrier that prevents the American people from reading—or even knowing—the contents of these mandatory regulations.

This issue of incorporation by reference (IBR) extends far beyond the subject of furniture tip-overs. Estimates indicate that the CFR today contains over twenty-seven thousand incorporations by reference to standards that are often not fully and freely accessible to the public. 12 Standards Incorporated by Reference (SIBR) Database, Nat’l Inst. Standards & Tech., https://sibr.nist.gov/ [https://perma.cc/3VBJ-SVSF] (last visited Aug. 6, 2024). Indeed, both executive and congressional mandates specifically encourage or—in some instances—require government agencies to utilize references to external standards when possible. 13 See infra notes 33–35 and accompanying text. Such incorporated references to privately developed standards appear in regulations related to nearly every sector of the economy, “from transportation systems and robotics to the construction of nuclear power plants.” 14 About, Stop the Pro Codes Act, https://www.stopprocodesact.com/about [https://perma.cc/ZN98-HC37] (last visited Aug. 27, 2025). Furthermore, attempts to standardize an industry by reference to materials not publicly available extend beyond the federal administrative law and regulatory spaces: Legislative bodies on the state and local levels have also deployed IBR when drafting laws, often leaving crucial municipal regulations (such as model building codes) locked behind a paywall. 15 See, e.g., Veeck v. S. Bldg. Code Cong. Int’l, Inc., 293 F.3d 791, 793 (5th Cir. 2002) (en banc) (discussing a situation in which privately developed model building codes were adopted by local governments to become the official building codes of two small towns in Texas). This Note argues that the most effective solution to increase access to incorporated standards is for Congress to pass a modified version of the Pro Codes Act that includes specific, additional pro-access provisions.

Part I of this Note discusses the background of this “incorporation by reference” practice and further explains the extent to which modern law and regulation rely on it. Part I also details steps that Congress has taken to alter the copyright status of works incorporated by reference and elaborates upon the recently introduced Protecting and Enhancing Public Access to Codes (Pro Codes) Act. Part II explains the problems that IBR creates for Americans and describes why attempts to place all incorporated materials into the public domain are dangerous to our nation’s regulatory practices. It also elaborates on why proposals to solve this problem through judicial, executive, and private means are insufficient, inconsistent, or unlikely. In Part III, this Note concludes by proposing a new piece of federal legislation that builds on the basic principles of the Pro Codes Act while incorporating new provisions that will improve Americans’ capacity to access incorporated standards.