Issue Archives

issue: Vol. 116, No. 6

JUST RELATIONSHIPS

Hanoch Dagan* & Avihay Dorfman**

Scholars traditionally conceptualize private law around a commitment to the values of formal freedom and equality. Critics of the traditional view (including lawyer-economists) dispute the significance of a distinction between public and private law, construing private law as merely one form of public regulation. Both positions are flawed. The traditional position is conceptually misguided and normatively disapยญpointing; the critical position...

Bankruptcy judges consider both value to creditors and harm to employees in deciding whether to liquidate or reorganize firms. This Article proposes to systematize what is currently an ad hoc trade-off by making bankruptcy law explicitly counter-cyclicalโ€”that is, placing more weight on preserving employment during times of high unemployยญment. Although the suggestion that bankruptcy law should consider emยญployment effects runs counter to decades...

Each state offers a property tax exemption to qualifying charitable organizations. Municipalities both administer these charitable exยญemptions and bear their economic cost. This creates an incentive for municipalities to adopt an interpretation of their stateโ€™s exemption framework that limits the exemptionโ€™s scope and preserves tax revenue. This Note focuses on community economic deยญvelopment (CED) organizations to explore how overly narrowed...

In its landmark Cracker Barrel no-action letter, the SEC staff anยญnounced a bright-line rule permitting exclusion of any shareholder proยญposal pertaining to a companyโ€™s management of its general workforce, even if focused on a significant social policy issue such as employment discrimination, under the โ€œordinary business operationsโ€ exclusion. The SEC reversed Cracker Barrel in 1998, returning to a case-specific approach...

THE EQUIPOISE EFFECT

Bert I. Huang*

This Essay explores an overlooked way to use the remedy of disยญgorgement in torts, contracts, and regulation. It begins with a reminder that disgorging net gains does not force the liable actor to take a loss; by definition, it allows him to break even. As a matter of incentives, it places him in a sort of equipoise. This equipoise effect has a logical upยญshot that might seem counterintuitive: Substituting disgorgement for any other remedy, part...