Judges on Demand: The Cognitive Case for Cameras in the Courtroom

By: Jordan M. Singer*

 

In 2011, the federal district courts began a pilot program to record and post full-length videos from selected civil proceedings. The program was deliberately structured to preserve the quality and integrity of ongoing adjudication. Three-and-a-half years in, ...READ MORE

Residual Impact: Resentencing Implications of Johnson’s Potential Ruling on ACCA’s Constitutionality

By: Leah M. Litman*

  In January 2015, the Supreme Court directed the parties to brief and argue an additional question in Johnson v. United States: “Whether the residual clause in the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii), ...READ MORE

Corporate Social Responsibility in the Night-Watchman State

By: Stephen M. Bainbridge*

 

When any Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court speaks on a corporate law topic, lawyers and academics who toil in that doctrinal vineyard listen.[1] When that Chief Justice is Leo Strine, they listen especially closely. The “well-respected”[2] Chief ...READ MORE

 

Negotiating Federalism and the Structural Constitution: Navigating the Separation of Powers Both Vertically and Horizontally

By: Erin Ryan *

 

Response to: Aziz Z. Huq, The Negotiated Structural Constitution, 114 Colum. L. Rev. 1595 (2014).

 

This Essay explores the emerging literature on the negotiation of structural constitutional governance, to which Professor Aziz Huq has made an important contribution in ...READ MORE

Free Speech and Speaker’s Intent: A Reply to Kendrick

By: Larry Alexander*

 

Response to: Leslie Kendrick, Free Speech and Guilty Minds, 114 Colum. L. Rev. 1255 (2014).

 

I have argued that a speaker’s mental state with respect to whether her words will cause harms that the government can legitimately seek to ...READ MORE

The Shadowy Contours of Bankruptcy Resistant Investments

By: Jared A. Ellias**

 

Response to: Douglas G. Baird & Anthony J. Casey, No Exit? Withdrawal Rights and the Law of Corporate Reorganizations, 113 Colum. L. Rev. 1 (2013).

 

Baird and Casey recently argued in favor of contractual innovations that allow lenders ...READ MORE

 

Gender Diversity and Same-Sex Marriage

By: Ian Farrell* & Nancy Leong**

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Opponents of same-sex marriage have recently adopted a curious new argument. The argument goes something like this. The Supreme Court has held that diversity is a compelling state interest in institutions of higher education. Opposite-sex marriage ...READ MORE

McCutcheon Calls for a National Referendum on Campaign Finance (Literally)

By: Andrew Tutt*

 

In McCutcheon v. FEC, the Supreme Court tightened First Amendment limits on Congress’s authority to regulate campaign financing. McCutcheon ostensibly left in place the old regime that allows campaign-finance regulation so long as it strikes at quid pro quo ...READ MORE

 

Not Helping: How Congressional Tinkering Harms Victims During the Post-Trial Phase of a Court-Martial

By: Zachary D Spilman*

 

INTRODUCTION

 

 

Congress made many changes to the Uniform Code of Military Justice1 (UCMJ) in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.2 Among these are two changes to Article 60 of the UCMJ that address the participation of victims ...READ MORE

On Mass Patent Aggregators

By: David L. Schwartz

 

Response to: Mark A. Lemley & A. Douglas Melamed, Missing the Forest for the Trolls, 113 Colum. L. Rev. 2117 (2013).

 

The debate about patent trolls is everywhere. From the op-ed pages of The Wall Street Journal and ...READ MORE

Borrowing by Any Other Name: Why Presidential “Spending Cuts” Would Still Exceed the Debt Ceiling

Neil H. Buchanan* and Michael C. Dorf**

 

On multiple occasions since mid-2011, the United States has come perilously close to exhausting its borrowing authority under a statutory limit commonly called the “debt ceiling.” In prior work, we argued that, in the event ...READ MORE

 

The Contraception Mandate Debate: Achieving a Sensible Balance

 Alan E. Garfield*

A slew of secular for-profit businesses have sued seeking exemptions from the contraception mandate and many have succeeded in obtaining preliminary injunctions. This Essay explains why courts have found these claims credible under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act ...READ MORE

Windsor, Animus, and the Future of Marriage Equality

Susannah W. Pollvogt*

 

Introduction

By formally declaring anyone opposed to same-sex marriage an enemy of human decency, the majority arms well every challenger to a state law restricting marriage to its traditional definition.1

Justice Scalia is certain that the reasoning of the majority ...READ MORE

Policing the Immigration Police: ICE Prosecutorial Discretion and the Fourth Amendment

Jason A. Cade*

 

Introduction

 

A persistent puzzle in immigration law is how the removal adjudication system should respond to the increasing prevalence of violations of noncitizens’ constitutional rights by arresting officers. Scholarship in this area has focused on judicial suppression of unconstitutionally ...READ MORE

 

Windsor, Federalism, and Family Equality

Courtney G. Joslin*

 

Introduction

 

On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in United States v. Windsor.1 In a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Kennedy, the Court held that section 3 of the Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)2 is unconstitutional.3 Advocates had ...READ MORE

Applying Miranda’s Public Safety Exception to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev: Restricting Criminal Procedure Rights by Expanding Judicial Exceptions

 

Joanna Wright*

 

Introduction

 

When the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) finally apprehended Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the only surviving suspect in the April 15, 2013, Boston Marathon Bombing, he was suffering from a gunshot wound and taken directly to the hospital, where he drifted ...READ MORE

The S&P Litigation and Access to Federal Court: A Case Study in the Limits of Our Removal Model

Gil Seinfeld*

 

Introduction

 

On June 6, 2013, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the MDL panel) ordered the consolidation of fifteen actions filed by state attorneys general (AGs) against the Standard & Poor’s rating agency (S&P) for its role in ...READ MORE

 

Just Enough

Lee Anne Fennell*

Response to: Brian Angelo Lee, Just Undercompensation: The Idiosyncratic Premium in Eminent Domain, 113 Colum. L. Rev. 593 (2013).

 

Does the constitutional measure of just compensation—fair market value—unfairly undercompensate those whose property is taken through eminent domain? The question ...READ MORE

Ham Sandwich Nation: Due Process When Everything Is a Crime

Glenn Harlan Reynolds*

Introduction

Prosecutorial discretion poses an increasing threat to justice. The threat has in fact grown more severe to the point of becoming a due process issue. Two recent events have brought more attention to this problem. One involves the ...READ MORE