Policing the Fourth Amendment: The Constitutionality of Warrantless Investigatory Stops for Past Misdemeanors

By: Sameer Bajaj

In the 1985 case of United States v. Hensley, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment permits police officers to perform warrantless investigatory stops for completed felonies. However, Hensley explicitly declined to address whether the Fourth Amendment allows such stops to investigate suspicion of completed misdemeanors. Since then, courts have ruled inconsistently on this issue, creating uncertainty in this important area of search and seizure law. This Note attempts to settle this uncertainty by examining the Fourth Amendment’s text, history, and jurisprudence. It argues that warrantless stops to investigate completed misdemeanors are constitutional when the underlying crime presents an ongoing danger.

  |   VIEW PDF

ESSAYS & BOOK REVIEWS

Announcements & Other Current Events

Review Mourns Loss of Lou Lowenstein '53

The Columbia Law Review regretfully notes the passing of its longtime Chairman of...

Columbia Law Review Names Administrative Board

The Editors of the Columbia Law Review are proud to announce its 2009-2010 Administrative...

NEWSLETTER

Sign up to join our newsletter

META